Chicago & Garamond

I’ve applied some new paint to the site in a few places since the fall. Headers, titles and several other items are now set in Chicago, while body copy is now set in Garamond. These two typefaces helped define the Apple experience for years, and I think they play nicely with the 512 Pixels brand.

Read more about Apple and typefaces here:

In the coming weeks, I hope to have the responsive design finished up (thanks to my pal PJ McCormick) to make reading on an iPad or iPhone more enjoyable.

As always, thanks for reading. I hope these changes make the experience better and easier for you all. (RSS readers, if you haven’t visited the site recently, drop by.)

Update: If you are seeing Palatino as the body font, try emptying your browser’s cache.

70Decibels’ Year In Review

Myke Hurley:

This year has been incredible. We launched the network in October, which saw the bundling of the existing shows and the additions of the new ones. We were also contacted by Apple at this time to help us set up our provider page and it’s got us featured in the UK store. This was such a great achievement for us, I had dreamt of this and could not believe it when it happened. We’ve come an awful long way in 12 short months and this fills me with such anticipation and excitement for what we can do in 2012.

It’s a blast to be a part of it. I can’t wait to see what 2012 has in store for the network.

I Just Don’t Get CES

People who have worked with — and for — me know this about me:

Half-baked work sold as a complete and acceptable solution will get under my skin every time.

If the person cannot grasp that their work could even be potentially shoddy, and I’m prone to having an aneurism.

I have found over the years that this character trait[1] shows up in all sorts of weird situations. One of the most disconnected one might be tech products and announcements.

That’s why I get angry every year when CES rolls around.

Every January, tech companies use the event to showcase their newest products. Over the years, these companies have pushed out hundreds of netbooks, TVs, e-readers, cameras and Android tablets into the world.

And most of them really, really suck.

Companies like Palm and Microsoft have used the show to off their plans and products. The original Pre was announced there in 2009, while the boys and girls from Redmond have talked about Windows Slates for what seems like an eternity.

It seems that things announced at CES are cursed. Maybe it’s because the event takes place in January, and these companies don’t have much to show off right after the holidays that’s any good.

While I’m sure that has a lot to do with it,[^2] I think that most of these companies simply don’t have any decent products to announce. Without a doubt, this year’s CES coverage will be full of semi-decent ultrabooks, cheap tablets, some crazy new television technology no one will actually want (or be able) to use and about a million new iPhone accessories.

None of these products will change the world. None of them will create blocks-long lines at their launch. It is hard to get people excited for cheap, shoddy devices that more and more look like knock-offs of Cupertino’s work.

In short, CES doesn’t have the magic a show of its size should have. I just don’t understand why people — mainly, the tech press — keep pretending it does.


  1. Flaw?
    [^2]: Remember when Apple left Macworld Expo?  ↩

The IBM Simon

Wikipedia:

Besides a mobile phone, the major applications were a calendar, address book, world clock, calculator, note pad, e-mail, and games. It had no physical buttons to dial with. Instead customers used a touchscreen to select phone numbers with a finger or create facsimiles and memos with an optional stylus. Text was entered with either a unique “predictive” on-screen keyboard or QWERTY keyboard. The Simon had an optional PCMCIA memory card.

I didn’t know this existed.

via Reddit

On the ‘Doomed’ E-ink Reader

Matt Alexander, regarding e-ink readers and full-blown tablets:

As much as you or I might enjoy the e-ink experience, people are not thrilled about buying a device that does one thing very well when they can buy something that does that one thing fairly well along with dozens of other features. And once that “fairly well” becomes “very well” as technology progresses, how could dedicated e-reading devices possibly remain relevant?

I like Matt, but I think he’s got this one wrong. I think people are thrilled about buying a Kindle because it does one thing, and does that one thing very well. Consumers (or at least the nerdy ones) seem just fine having a dedicated device in this category, as well as another device that can do lots of other things. Why would that change all of a sudden in the future?

Guest Post: The New Genius Bar

Editor’s Note: This was sent to be by a reader of the site who shall remain unnamed, in response to the discussions this week of the shift at Apple’s Genius Bars. The writer’s thoughts closely track with mine at how the Genius Bar — and Apple Retail on the whole — has shifted.

It is re-printed here with permission.

Change

Even at training (Early 2009) our instructor warned us about ‘Old School vs. New School’ Geniuses. His emphasis was that the needs of the business change. He advised us to keep our eyes on the Credo, and not to get hung up on the way things used to be. Consumer electronics is a fast-paced world.

Customers generally wanted the same things: resolutions to their computer troubles, a better understanding of their equipment and its capabilities, and a calm, soothing friend who let them know it was ok they had forgotten their Hotmail password again. This often meant 20 minutes of one-on-one time with a Genius.

iOS products attract a very different customer. Their needs and willingness to learn are different. Most problems customers have are (they think) simple and don’t require an extended interaction. These customers don’t want to ‘hang out with a genius’ — they want their phone to work. NOW.

Tasks like replacing a display, swapping a phone, or updating software don’t require the same skills that isolating a failed video card or manually recreating a user in OS X do. As iPhones and iPads continue to fly out the door, the role of a Genius shifts.

I didn’t want to primarily support phones. Not because I don’t think it’s an awesome product, but because there was a lot of monotony and there were few portable job skills learned. I always saw the Genius role as a stepping stone into other IT jobs.

Increased Demand

Everyone hates being asked to do more work than they did yesterday. Apple’s growth is explosive.

This is where competent managers make all the difference. A savvy scheduler who stays on top of hiring and training the appropriate staff makes everyone’s job easier. I worked at two different stores, and though both were very busy, you could tell a big difference in the workload. I wouldn’t have lasted nearly as long if I hadn’t ended up at a “good” store. If there was one thing the retail stores aren’t consistent with and could use improvement on, here it is.

I worked with guys who could pop through 35–40 appointments in a day and almost all their customers were very happy. I worked with others who would waste 20 minutes of my time whining about how they didn’t have time to “connect” with their customers. These were the guys who caused the bar to consistently be behind and forced me to take 2–3 appointments at a time.

Apple is a family. When one family member is unhappy and vocal, it can be toxic. There were certain people I wished would have been asked to leave.

Emotional Drain

Most Geniuses are emotionally invested in their jobs. Their ability to assess and react to any situation with skill, tact, and empathy keeps customers ranking Apple support so high, year after year. I gave the role my all, but most days it meant I went home empty, too emotionally exhausted to socialize.

As you get better at the job, your ability to assess and react to unspoken tension improves. This is great on the job, but hell when I would go out in public. I couldn’t turn that part of my brain off. I wanted to fix every problem I perceived. I had panic attack. This inability to interact normally was a major reason why I had to leave.

I worked with a number of +5 year geniuses — some were getting toasty. All had an ability to keep emotional distance and keep pace with the changing demand and way of doing business. Those that stay on for another 5 years will have good times and bad, but will still love the job in whatever form its in. Being a Genius is a hard job, and for some it becomes more difficult as time goes on.

Oh, and it is often said that the average lifespan of a Genius at the company is a mere 18 months.

Conclusion

Working for Apple means you are always on the cutting edge. If you want to work with the best people, you need to be one of those people. Every 3 or 4 months you have to look hard at yourself and the current incarnation of the job and ask, Am I the best fit for this job? Am I willing to deal with the problem of the week and offer feasible solutions? Is my mental health in a state where I can enjoy this? Would I want to work with me with my current attitude?

If the answer is no, I hope a manager helps you through that tough time and out the door if need be.

On Reader Email

There’s been a lot of talk about blog comments this week, and how many writers prefer reader email, tweets or even other blog posts as responses.

Sometimes, however, reader email can be just as much fun as comments:

Sad

Seriously, whoever sent this in (and used a fake email account to get past my contact form), thanks a ton. You’re a total jackass for thinking this, let alone sending it to me. Die in a fire.