On Mountain Lion’s System Requirements and Consumer Confusion – Updated

The past few versions of Mac OS X have had fairly simple-to-remember key system requirements. If a machine met these key requirements, the other ones (RAM, available hard drive space) were met by default in most cases:

  • Leopard required a 867 Mhz G4 or better
  • Snow Leopard was Intel-only.
  • Lion required a Core2Duo processor or higher

Mountain Lion, due out this month, has slightly more complicated specs:

  • OS X v10.6.8 or later
  • 2GB of memory
  • 8GB of available space

Additionally, these machines are the only ones supported:

  • iMac (Mid 2007 or newer)
  • MacBook (Late 2008 Aluminum, or Early 2009 or newer)
  • MacBook Pro (Mid/Late 2007 or newer)
  • Xserve (Early 2009)
  • MacBook Air (Late 2008 or newer)
  • Mac mini (Early 2009 or newer)
  • Mac Pro (Early 2008 or newer)

Apple’s thinking here is fairly transparent: consumers are probably more likely to know what model they own than the processor within their computer.

However, the processor information is just a few clicks away in the “About This Mac” window, under the Apple menu.

The model name is hidden behind the “More Info…” button:

Back when Apple sold OS discs in its Stores, we used to have customers come in all the time, wanting a refund after they discovered the OS they had purchased wouldn’t run on their Mac. With the Mac App Store, what sort of recourse is there? Sure, Mountain Lion’s installer checks that it can run, but only after its been downloaded.

I’d love to see the Mac App Store run a check on the system before downloading the Mountain Lion installer, alerting consumers before a purchase if it could not be run on that particular system. Doing so might save a lot of heartache, since Mountain Lion won’t run on as many machines as Lion did.

Update: It seems some people have had the App Store balk at downloading 10.8 betas on machines that don’t meet requirements. Hopefully this continues with the public release.

On Paying Writers →

Aaron Mahnke, on the Read & Trust blog:

Read & Trust exists to bring together some of the best online writers around and make it easy for readers to experience and follow them, without wasting time through trial and error. These writers cover a wide range of topics, from politics to tech, and travel to…well…even writing itself. And they’re damn good at what they do.

If you aren’t a paying member of Read & trust, it’s time to change that.

A Review and Walk-Through of ‘Steve Jobs: The Lost Interview’

Note: This post contains spoilers. Hence, the page break on the homepage of the site. — SH


I just finished watching Steve Jobs: The Lost Interview.

While (like Marco), I can’t shake the feeling that the whole thing is a money-grab, after watching it, I’m happy I dropped the $4 to rent the hour long video.

Here are some thoughts, written up as I watched the interview.

Continue Reading → “A Review and Walk-Through of ‘Steve Jobs: The Lost Interview’”

Overthinking →

Gruber:

I bet Apple could make a $199 iPad Mini and turn a profit on it — especially with a $249 version sitting next to it with double the storage. It’s that simple. If Apple thinks people would buy a smaller cheaper iPad and that they could turn a profit making them, they’ll do it. No reason to overthink it.

Yet, I can’t stop overthinking it. I’m just not sold on where a product like this would fit. Who is it for? What makes it better than the iPod touch or 9.7-inch iPad?

Maybe this product could do what the iPod mini did.