- I hate everything about this.
- I could have told our city leadership that something like was inevitable… as could have many, many other people.
The King of All Stream Decks ⇢
Polaris Dawn Completes First Private Spacewalk ⇢
SpaceX’s Polaris Dawn astronauts successfully performed a spacewalk, marking the first done by a private company. After depressurizing SpaceX’s Dragon capsule, the billionaire funding the mission, Jared Isaacman, emerged from the spacecraft early Thursday morning.
With his torso and head fully sticking outside the capsule, Isaacman performed tests on SpaceX’s new spacesuits, which are designed for increased mobility. “Back at home, we all have a lot of work to do,” Isaacman said during the spacewalk. “But from here, it sure looks like a perfect world.”
Isaacman’s Polaris Program is a huge St. Jude supporter. The dude is out here making history and trying to solve childhood cancer.
Connected #518: Is FileMaker Carbon Neutral? ⇢
This week on a jam-packed episode of the world’s greatest podcast:
The guys score their picks regarding Apple’s “It’s Glowtime” event.
Things didn’t go well for everyone.
Mac Power Users #762: It’s Glowtime ⇢
This week on a special episode of MPU:
Apple’s September event brought new iPhones, updated AirPods, and a revised Apple Watch line. Stephen and David sort through the news and share their thoughts.
No Mo’ Chemo
On June 25, 2010, our son had his “No More Chemo” party at St. Jude Children’s Hospital, at nearly 20 months of age:
![]()
These parties are one of my favorite things about life at St. Jude:
Confetti, singing and cheering aren’t what you think of when you think of a hospital. But St. Jude isn’t just any hospital. And when patients receiving chemotherapy finish treatment, we celebrate with a No More Chemo party.
For Josiah’s party, the room was full of the medical staff that had been with us on his journey. Together, we got to celebrate how far our son had come in his short life. In May 2009 when Josiah was diagnosed with a malignant brain tumor, we knew none of the people in the room.
By June 25, 2010, they were family. They had worked day and night, for months, to help save our son’s life. They had seen us at our lowest moments, always ready to point us toward hope.
St. Jude is in the business of hope, and these parties are one teeny tiny part of what makes it such a special place. Your generous support allows St. Jude to keep working until the ultimate “No More Chemo” party can take place — the one we’ll all throw when the threat of cancer is a thing of the past, for all children, everywhere.
Why Do You Have To Go and Make Things So Complicated?
Apple held its annual iPhone event today, and the biggest thought in my mind about is that Apple’s product messaging has gotten confusing.
![]()
Apple Watch
For years, rumors have claimed that the Apple Watch Ultra would fall off the annual release cycle the standard Apple Watch enjoys, and it happened today, with the Ultra picking up the saddest label I’ve ever see on Apple’s website:
![]()
I mean, the satin black finish looks incredible, but why didn’t the Ultra receive any other updates, especially as it sits at the high-end of the product line? I understand that the Apple Watch SE doesn’t need annual refreshing, but the Ultra being in that bucket just doesn’t make sense to me.
Then there’s the Apple Watch Series 10. The keynote made it seem that the smaller size had been cancelled, leading to much handwringing until apple.com was updated, showing both sizes. The larger of the two is bigger than the Ultra 2.
What is the strategy there? The Ultra certainly retains many advantages over the Series 10, and Apple did rattle those off, but the product strategy that the Ultra is the most advanced Watch seems to have died.
Had there been a new Ultra, maybe the company would be more comfortable comparing two new models with each other, but pitching the new Series 10 against a year-old product would be weird. It’s all very messy, for reasons that aren’t all that clear.
AirPods
I assume that Apple is trying to move away from the “older ones stick around for less money” complications, but 1) Apple employs that strategy all over the place and 2) I think people understood the differences between the AirPods 2 and AirPods 3.
…but now there are two models of AirPods 4, with vastly different features and a $50 price difference. Granted, it’s probably the best $50 you can spend in an Apple Store.
![]()
I have seen some people poking fun of the “AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation” name… but honestly I think it totally works, and is a necessary given the lineup.
Then there’s the not-dead-yet AirPods Max. Apple swapped in USB-C for the old Lightning port, but the rest of the product is basically unchanged. It still ships with the old H1 chip, meaning the new AirPods Max miss out on many modern features. The Max reuses same somewhat-flawed design, and is sold for the same high price. Apple left a lot on the table in terms of improving the product, and that’s always disappointing and a little head-scratching.
Camera Control
![]()
Let me start this by saying I love how this feature looked in the video. The UI looks fun and I’m sure the technology is going to be fantastic to use, but I worry Apple overloaded the button. Here’s a bit from Jason Snell’s hands-on:
The button itself feels really good. It’s a real button — if you push it all the way down, you can feel it depress with a pleasing tactile response. But it’s also a touch- and pressure-sensitive button that lets you “push halfway” to bring up another set of options, for things like zooming in or switching between photographic styles. If you keep your finger on the button and half-push twice in quick succession, you’ll be taken up one level in the hierarchy and can swipe to different commands. Then half-push once to enter whatever controls you want, and you’re back to swiping. It takes a few minutes to get used to the right set of gestures, but it’s a potentially powerful feature—and at its base, it’s still very simple: push to bring up the camera, push to shoot, and push and hold to shoot video.
There was a time where Apple would have introduced this as a way to launch the camera, set focus, and take a photo. That’s it. Three jobs; just one button. (Are you getting it?)
Many of the features in Apple’s Camera app are hidden behind swipes. It’s one thing when there’s a whole screen to show what’s happening, but I have no doubt people will get this new button into a state that makes them feel lost, spending more time tinkering with their phones than taking the photo they wanted to capture. Sometimes less is more, and I fear the Camera Control feature may be on the wrong side of that divide.
Apple Intelligence
As expected, Apple spent quite a bit of time on Apple Intelligence.1 but Apple refuses to draw clear lines around what it considers to be part of this suite of features. I know Apple feels pressure to retcon features as “intelligent,” slapping a new sticker over old “machine learning” labels. I just wish Apple didn’t bow to that pressure so often.
In his segment, Craig Federighi showed off the iPhone 16 and 16 Pro’s ability to use the Camera Control button to process visual information. He briefly mentioned sending images to Google and sharing data with ChatGPT, but it was so fast that my notes have a lot of “?????” in them.
Then there’s the hardware. When Apple was describing the differences between the new A18 and A18 Pro systems on a chip, I assumed we’d hear about some AI-powered feature that was made possible only by the better chip, but as far as I can tell, that wasn’t the case, but it felt like Apple was teeing something up.
I have very little idea about what normal folks have heard of Apple Intelligence.
In the months since WWDC, I’ve had friends ask me hand-wavy questions about Apple and AI, but nothing specific. That is going to change with these phones… except that the features won’t be present at launch. Some of them won’t be here for months. I think Apple’s been clear about that in its communication, but I wonder if that will break through to the masses who are going to be ordering new phones in the meantime.
The Trend
In writing this, I couldn’t help but think about that Apple Pencil chart from a year ago:
![]()
As Apple has grown, it has to offer more products, at more price points, to sell to more people.
Sometimes, that means selling older products at discounted prices, but it feels like today’s event was a new chapter in that story. Some of the announcements today were hard to understand, even as someone who has written about Apple for nearly 16 years. The event felt undisciplined in areas, and felt somehow both too long and too short for what Apple had to introduce.
As I have been writing this post, I’ve been surprised at my own feelings concerning this event. New iPhones are always fun, and the 16 and 16 Pro look like great updates. The Apple Watch Series 10 is only going to widen Apple’s lead over everyone else in the smartwatch market. AirPods are basically magic. And that’s not to mention any of the very impressive health features these products will bring to the market. That’s all good stuff, regardless of my complaints with the stagecraft.
- After using the 18.1 Developer Beta on my carry phone for a while now, my personal excitement over these features has cooled greatly, but that’s a blog post for another evening. ↩
‘The Observatory’ Set to Open at Apple Park ⇢
Dezeen can exclusively reveal photos of technology company Apple’s new events venue, which is built into the hillside at the Apple Park campus in California.
Set to officially open later today, The Observatory is the most significant building to be completed on the campus since the Steve Jobs Theater opened in 2017.
Designed “as a contemplative space”, the subterranean building will be used for launch events and to showcase the brand’s latest technology.
This space looks amazing.
Sponsor: Unite 5 Turns Web Apps Into Supercharged macOS Apps ⇢
Unite 5 for macOS takes your web experience to the next level, transforming websites into feature-rich Mac apps. Powered by a completely redesigned WebKit browser, Unite 5 offers a more immersive and customizable browsing experience.
![]()
What sets Unite 5 apart? We’ve gone beyond just app conversion. Our new intricate link-forwarding rules give you unparalleled control over web interactions, making your web apps smarter and more integrated than ever before.
Some highlights of Unite 5:
- Advanced Link-Forwarding: Navigate your web apps like a pro.
- Revamped Browser Engine: Faster, more reliable, and tailored for macOS.
- Enhanced Customization: More ways to make your web apps truly yours.
Create powerful web apps in seconds, such as:
- A Gmail client that integrates seamlessly with macOS.
- A resource-efficient Slack or Discord app with full notification support.
- A dedicated AI app for ChatGPT or Claude.AI
- A Robinhood or Figma app that feels native on your desktop.
512 Pixels readers get an exclusive 20% off this week! Use the promo code 512Pixels at checkout or visit bzgapps.com/unite512.
Experience Unite 5 for yourself with a 14-day free trial, or access it as part of a Setapp subscription.
Mac Power Users #761: Mr. Automation: Matt Cassinelli ⇢
Matt Cassinelli joins the show to discuss his background with Workflow and Apple and how it led to him becoming the “Shortcuts Guy.” The group then discusses Apple’s automation tools across its platforms, and how those tools have extended to the web.
Ten Years Ago, Apple & U2 Gave ‘Songs of Innocence’ to Over Half a Billion iTunes Users
Monday, September 9 will mark ten years since Apple announced the iPhone 6 and 6 Plus, as well as the Apple Watch.
![]()
That’s all fine and good, but the real news of the day was free music from U2:
Apple, Universal Music Group and legendary rock band U2 today announced the release of the album “Songs of Innocence,” which Apple is gifting to iTunes Store customers around the world, making it the largest album release ever with over half a billion copies distributed. The album features 11 new songs from the band and charts their earliest influences from 70s rock and punk rock to early 80s electronica and soul. The album is free for iTunes Store account holders in 119 countries and is available exclusively on iTunes for the next five weeks.
“From the very beginning U2 have always wanted our music to reach as many people as possible, the clue is in our name I suppose—so today is kind of mind-blowing to us. The most personal album we’ve written could be shared with half a billion people… by hitting send. If only songwriting was that easy,” said U2 lead singer Bono. “It’s exciting and humbling to think that people who don’t know U2 or listen to rock music for that matter might check us out. Working with Apple is always a blast. They only want to do things that haven’t been done before—that’s a thrill to be part of.”
“U2 has been an important part of Apple’s history in music and we’re thrilled to make ‘Songs of Innocence’ the largest album release ever,” said Eddy Cue, Apple’s senior vice president of Internet Software and Services. “We get to share our love of music today by gifting this great new album to over half a billion iTunes customers around the world.”
The 11-track album started appearing in people’s iTunes accounts and the shit hit the fan. Users flooded social media, surprised to see new music in their accounts. Some feared they had been hacked, while others were simply annoyed.
![]()
A week later, Apple started walking the whole thing back, as Chris Welch reported at the time:
To put it lightly, Apple’s “gift” of a free U2 album hasn’t been warmly received by everyone. And it seems the company has heard the chorus of complaints loud and clear. As of today, Apple’s offering an easy way to permanently erase Songs of Innocence with a single click. Doing so immediately removes U2’s latest album from your iTunes music library and iTunes purchase history. Apple has even set up a support website to guide people through the process.
Note that erasing the album means it will no longer show up in your “purchases” tab. So if you want to re-download it for another listen, you’ll need to go through the regular album purchase process again. Songs of Innocence will remain free until October 13th; after that, Apple’s window of exclusivity closes and you’ll need to pay for it should you regret the decision to delete Bono’s hard work. The fact that Apple had to go this far and publish a removal tool almost puts U2’s new album on the same footing as malware or aggressive antivirus software, but at least the complaining should end.
Here’s a bit from that now-retired support article:
Learn how to remove the iTunes gift album “Songs of Innocence” from your iTunes music library and purchases.
Follow these instructions to remove U2’s “Songs of Innocence” from your iTunes music library and iTunes purchases. Once the album has been removed from your account, it will no longer be available for you to redownload as a previous purchase. If you later decide you want the album, you will need to get it again. The album is free to everyone until October 13, 2014, and will be available for purchase after that date.
Despite this document, the album haunted some people for years.
In 2022, Bono apologized for the entire thing. Here’s a bit from his memoir, via The Guardian:
“Free music?” asked Tim Cook, the CEO of Apple, with a look of mild incredulity. “Are you talking about free music?”
Ten years had gone by since the Vertigo ads; we were in his office in Cupertino, California – Guy Oseary, our new manager, me, [Apple executives] Eddy Cue and Phil Schiller – and we’d just played the team some of our new Songs of Innocence album.
“You want to give this music away free? But the whole point of what we’re trying to do at Apple is to not give away music free. The point is to make sure musicians get paid.”
“No,” I said, “I don’t think we give it away free. I think you pay us for it, and then you give it away free, as a gift to people. Wouldn’t that be wonderful?”
Tim Cook raised an eyebrow. “You mean we pay for the album and then just distribute it?”
I said, “Yeah, like when Netflix buys the movie and gives it away to subscribers.”
Tim looked at me as if I was explaining the alphabet to an English professor. “But we’re not a subscription organisation.”
“Not yet,” I said. “Let ours be the first.”
Tim was not convinced. “There’s something not right about giving your art away for free,” he said. “And this is just to people who like U2?”
“Well,” I replied, “I think we should give it away to everybody. I mean, it’s their choice whether they want to listen to it.”
See what just happened? You might call it vaunting ambition. Or vaulting. Critics might accuse me of overreach. It is.
If just getting our music to people who like our music was the idea, that was a good idea. But if the idea was getting our music to people who might not have had a remote interest in our music, maybe there might be some pushback. But what was the worst that could happen? It would be like junk mail. Wouldn’t it? Like taking our bottle of milk and leaving it on the doorstep of every house in the neighbourhood.
Not. Quite. True.
On 9 September 2014, we didn’t just put our bottle of milk at the door but in every fridge in every house in town. In some cases we poured it on to the good people’s cornflakes. And some people like to pour their own milk. And others are lactose intolerant.
I take full responsibility.
I hope he also took responsibility for … whatever this was:
![]()
The Color Czar at Work ⇢
Looks like the colors of Monday’s new iPhones have leaked, and once again the Pro phones are just so… boring.