Earlier today, the site MacJournals recommended TUAW’s coverage of Apple’s “It’s Only Rock and Roll” media event to their readers via Twitter. A few hours later, they followed up with this:
We wouldn’t have recommended TUAW liveblog coverage had we known how vicious it would be. We’ll know for the future.
This didn’t go over well with TUAW. Here’s the crux of MacJournal’s reasoning:
However, we found today’s coverage viciously unaware and unsympathetic of anything beyond TUAW’s own narrow view of the technology world. TUAW aggressively dismissed anything that wasn’t a new product announcement, said that Apple’s failure to meet false rumors were “legitimate complaints,” and provided no context for why anyone should have believed any of the rumors other than the fact that they were actual rumors.
Despite using the Flash-based CoverItLive service that made live updates flow smoothly to our (non-iPhone) browsers, it was not useful to our readers, nor to anyone who hadn’t spent time following and dissecting unsourced and unfounded gossip. We would not have recommended that readers follow the live coverage had we known this, and we will hesitate to recommend TUAW live coverage in the future because of it.
TUAW’s later published coverage of today’s events is more considered and useful, though it still maintains an unhealthy tone of wondering why rumors didn’t become reality, rather than ever asking why people believed rumors that turned out to be false. TUAW is far from alone in this myopia, but it’s not nearly at the level that permeated the live chat, and should not dissuade you from reading more if you seek more information about today’s announcements.
I reviewed the transcript of TUAW’s Liveblog, and I agree. It’s very, very hard to glean much information from all the chatter. There’s nothing wrong with chatter, but MacJournals was right in discouraging users from considering the site’s coverage a news source.
Blogging isn’t news. Bloggers aren’t reporters. Confusing banter between staff members isn’t news — it’s not even good blogging. Getting upset when the rumors you passed along isn’t good, either. The conversation that took place on TUAW’s liveblog belonged in a chat room, not on the front page of a major website.
Interestingly, bigger blogs like Engadget very often shine during large events, simply churning out updates as they break, without the useless babble the TUAW staff took part in this morning. They get their opinions out after the news — the way it should be.
Bloggers need to remember their place — TUAW isn’t a news outlet. Neither is Gizmodo or Daring Fireball or Engadget or ForkBombr. Yes, blogs can break news, sure. But they are no replacement for real news sources, and probably never will be. TUAW proved that today.