Eric Slivka:
Back in early July, a UK court ruled that Samsung had not infringed upon the design of the iPad with its own Galaxy Tab device, with judge Colin Birss ruling that the Galaxy Tab was simply “not as cool” as the iPad. Roughly a week later, Birss ruled that Apple must publish advertisements on its website and in newspapers acknowledging that Samsung did not copy the iPad’s design.
Apple quickly appealed the ruling and was granted a stay until that appeal could be heard.
[…]
The appeals judges ruled that Apple could satisfy the posting requirement for its own website by including a small link entitled “Samsung/Apple judgement” on the site for a period of one month.
That July ruling sure seemed like a joke. Glad that the appeals court ruled something a little less juvenile.