The Case For — and Against — Apple Shipping a Larger iMac

There’s been a lot of discussion about the iMac recently, and the thing I was struck by this time around was the place the iMac holds in Apple’s product line.

I’ve shown this chart a lot over the years, but it highlights that when it was launched, the iMac was squarely on the consumer side of the grid:

Grid of 4

Apple blew away the Grid of 4 a long time ago — first breaking it with the G4 Cube — and over time, the iMac slowly creeped up to encroach on the professional side of things.

First, it got FireWire, then a G4 and a SuperDrive, then it was the first Mac (by a few minutes) to switch to Intel.

In the Intel era, the iMac truly shined, becoming more and more capable.1 The 5K iMac was jaw-dropping, and the iMac Pro that followed it was the best all-in-one Apple has ever shipped.

In the Apple silicon era, the iMac was reinvented yet again, The current M1-powered machine is beautiful and powerful, but Apple has let it sit since introducing it in April 2021, even as almost every other Mac in the lineup has been updated to an M2-based system on a chip.

The lack of updates and the 24-inch display have left many considering the iMac to be a consumer-level machine again. “Sure, it’s pretty,” you may be tempted to tweet post, “but it’s not the powerhouse the iMac Pro was six years ago when it was introduced.”2

The iMac and iMac Pro

This all brings us to the fact that, for the first time in two decades, Apple is only selling one size of iMac. Let’s dive into why Apple should (or shouldn’t) change that, mostly ignoring the web of rumors that surround this topic.

The Case Against a Larger iMac

All-in-ones are inherently compromised due to their form factor. Do you think Apple wanted to put the headphone jack on the side of the M1 iMac? What about when the computer is out dated? Target Display Mode is long gone, and doesn’t seem to be coming back, so it just seems wasteful to pay for a nice, big display just to have the computer behind it drag it down like an anchor after its useful life is over.

Apple has fixed all of this with the Studio Display and its other desktops! The M2 Pro Mac mini is great! Need more? Get a Mac Studio! Shoot, you can even buy a notebook and use it as a desktop without many of the compromises that would bring back in the bad old Intel days! You just don’t need a big iMac anymore with the riches that Apple silicon has brought to the lineup.

The Case For a Larger iMac

The big iMac fits many workstations better than a display with a computer hanging around somewhere. Who wants cables?! Gross! All-in-ones are graceful and elegant, and when’s the last time you actually had an iMac around and you wanted to use its display as a display? That sounds like a fairy tale made up to argue with someone on a forum somewhere.

The iMac is the flagship Mac, and Apple should treat it as such. I’d be willing to pay for the all-in-one experience with a 27-inch (or larger!) display. The company had something really special on their hands with the iMac Pro, and having a Mac mini just doesn’t have the same feeling to it. A big iMac has a presence about it that Apple should preserve.

Apple spent two decades shaping the iMac into something that pros could really use, and they shouldn’t throw away all that good will. Apple should give the people what they want; just listen to Dan Moren:

As an all-in-one desktop, the iMac offers a convenience and price unmatched by any other Apple desktop. Even a base-level Mac mini starts to get pricey once you add an Apple Studio Display to it, and while the flexibility is appreciated, there are still customers (including institutions and education) that appreciate the simplicity of a one-and-done purchase. Adding a more powerful configuration could entice people who might otherwise by a cheaper model to upgrade to a better configuration, especially if they don’t also have to buy a display.

What Do I Think?

I, for one, would like to see a larger iMac make it out into the world, complete with a Pro-level SoC, like the Mac mini has received. The RAM and storage caps on the base-level SoCs feel too limited for a larger iMac. Yes, it would even more SKUs to an already-crowded desktop line, but for twenty years, iMac users have been able to choose a larger, more powerful machine if it fits their needs and preferences, and the M1 model just doesn’t live up to that legacy.


  1. There is a caveat to this, and it’s the fact that Apple kept spinning hard drives around for way too long in the iMac, and the 21.5-inch model languished in the last few years of its life pretty badly. 
  2. Don’t think too hard about the fact that the M1 iMac is faster than the iMac Pro in a bunch of tasks. 

According to Foreca’s Weather Data, Everyone in Memphis is Dead

Like many places around the world, it is very hot in Memphis currently. When I checked to see how hot it was, I was in for a surprise.

I’m a long-time CARROT Weather user, and love the app for its customization options and powerful UI. One of those features is the ability to change the source for the weather data shown in the app.

I’ve used Foreca for years, as according to Forecast Advisor, it’s among the most accurate sources for where I live.

However, I have noticed that Foreca tends to be a little aggressive when it comes to the heat index, often being much higher than other sources. Today, that was very apparent:

Weather data across sources

Foreca has the heat index at a whopping 138 °F (58.9 °C) while Apple Weather and AccuWeather are far less murdery at 108 °F (42.2 °C) and 115 °F (46.1 °C), respectively. AerisWeather, the next-most accurate source for my area, has the index at 110 °F (43.3 °C).

No weather service has perfect data. Apple Weather seems to inflate precipitation chances for me, while AccuWeather and others have been caught selling user data without making the proper disclosures to users. For now, I’ve swapped CARROT over to using AerisWeather’s data and seeing how things go.

Apple Posts 3rd Quarter Results

Apple:

Apple today announced financial results for its fiscal 2023 third quarter ended July 1, 2023. The Company posted quarterly revenue of $81.8 billion, down 1 percent year over year, and quarterly earnings per diluted share of $1.26, up 5 percent year over year.

“We are happy to report that we had an all-time revenue record in Services during the June quarter, driven by over 1 billion paid subscriptions, and we saw continued strength in emerging markets thanks to robust sales of iPhone,” said Tim Cook, Apple’s CEO. “From education to the environment, we are continuing to advance our values, while championing innovation that enriches the lives of our customers and leaves the world better than we found it.”

A billion paying pockets, y’all!

Jason Snell has the charts.

Apple Admits to Screen Time Crimes

Julie Jargon has a piece for The Wall Street Journal (Apple News link) about the state of Apple’s Screen Time software:

The company’s cloud-based Family Sharing system is designed in part for parents to remotely schedule off-limits time and restrict apps and adult content on their children’s iPhones, iPads and iPod Touch models. Trouble is, parents are finding that when they use their iPhones to set restrictions on their kids’ devices, the changes don’t stick.

“We are aware that some users may be experiencing an issue where Screen Time settings are unexpectedly reset,” an Apple spokeswoman said. “We take these reports very seriously and we have been, and will continue, making updates to improve the situation.”

I’ve run into this a couple of times on my kids’ devices and thought I was losing my mind, and it’s nothing new:

Apple previously acknowledged the bug, calling it “an issue where Screen Time settings may reset or not sync across all devices.” However, the company had reported the issue fixed with iOS 16.5, which came out in May. In our testing the bug persists, even with the new public beta of iOS 17.

I don’t understand how this has made it past Apple’s QA process on more than one occasion.

Welcome to the Wild World of HomePod mini Stands

On today’s episode of Connected, Federico talked about a HomePod mini base he recently purchased that includes a 10000mAh battery for using the small speaker outdoors. I ordered one, looking forward to enjoying the situations shown off in the product’s silly photography:

PlusAcc for HomePod Mini Battery Base

This led me down a road I didn’t expect to travel, exploring the wild world of weird HomePod mini stands. Here are some of my favorites:

Up first, we have the BELIEFLUO Outlet Shelf Holder, Bathroom Decor with Built-in Cable Management,A Space Saving Solution for Homepod Mini,Google Home/Echo/Smart Speakers/Electric Toothbrush/Cell Phone (Decora). This product screws into an outlet cover and provides a shelf for your HomePod mini to sit on, all safe and sound:

BELIEFLUO stand

While we’re considering how to mount a HomePod mini near an outlet, let’s take a look at the $13.99 LeongLzt Ouligei Top-Notch Quality Homepod Mini Wall Mount Holder, Homepod Mini Plug Mount with in-Built Cable Management System, No Screws Needed – an Elegant Space Saving Accessory:

LeongLzt mount

I’m not sure I would trust an outlet to hold the weight of a HomePod mini, but that’s where the TotalMount Compatible with HomePod Mini – Hole-Free Design Eliminates The Need to Drill Holes in Your Wall (Premium White – Hole-Free Mount) comes in. As outlined in the name, this mount gives you yet another option for attaching a HomePod mini to your wall: adhesive tabs!

TotalMount

If adhesive tabs aren’t your thing, you can always just screw a mount right into your wall.

If all of these products just aren’t murdery enough for you, may I suggest you check out the Madatop Stand for Homepod Mini, ABS Holder Tripod with Robot Shape, Safe Stable Mount with Anti-Slip Silicone Pad Protects Home pod Mini Speaker Well, a $26 HomePod mini stand complete with adjustable robot legs:

Madatop stand

I am afraid of this one.