Synology to Require Synology-Branded Drives in Some Products

Kevin Purdy, writing at Ars Technica:

Popular NAS-maker Synology has confirmed and slightly clarified a policy that appeared on its German website earlier this week: Its “Plus” tier of devices, starting with the 2025 series, will require Synology-branded hard drives for full compatibility, at least at first.

“Synology-branded drives will be needed for use in the newly announced Plus series, with plans to update the Product Compatibility List as additional drives can be thoroughly vetted in Synology systems,” a Synology representative told Ars by email. “Extensive internal testing has shown that drives that follow a rigorous validation process when paired with Synology systems are at less risk of drive failure and ongoing compatibility issues.”

Without these drives, some features will be disabled, including volume-wide deduplication and hard drive lifespan analysis.

Casey Liss:

Synology were kind enough to send me a filled, 8-bay network attached storage device back in 2013. Within a couple months I was in love. Having infinite storage available really changes how you think about your digital life. While a Synology is not for most people, it’s 10000% for people like me. I would not and did not stop talking about them. I’ve personally sold countless number of Synology units by my enthusiasm alone.

This week, things finally changed, officially. Synology will be restricting features for those who do not use Synology-branded drives. Drives that are bog-standard enterprise hard drives, possibly with some custom firmware in them.

Why? For more revenue.

Corruption is Winning

On Friday’s episode of The Vergecast, there was an exchange that really caught my attention. David Pierce mentioned the photos of all the tech CEOs at Trump’s inauguration in January, to which Nilay Patel replied:

The thing that kills me at that is the expectation they had going into that photo was corruption. Right? Tim Cook is going to personally donate a million dollars to Trump’s library and that will take the DOJ case away from Apple. Naked corruption. That is a nakedly corrupt thought.

That’s fine in the sense that a lot of people believe the government is corrupt, and so Trump being even more corrupt does not offend them. But it’s not fine in the sense that like even when we were covering the Google case today, people on Bluesky were replying to me being like, “they’ll just buy him off.” What? That means that the system is collapsed. Like you don’t believe in it anymore. And maybe you didn’t before, but the level to which we have accepted that just naked corruption is how this works is a little more dangerous than I think people are giving it credit for.

If you believe that Google can be like, ah, screw it, write them a check and it’ll go away. Maybe you don’t think that’s right, but you think that is possible, it’s gone. You have to not believe that’s possible. You have to actually hold everybody to account and say, actually, that’s corruption.

If you give into nihilism that the corruption is already won, you’ve just given in. You should not feel helpless; you should feel outraged that the expectation of that photograph was corruption.

I am sure if we were to poll the likes of Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, Sundar Pichai, Sergey Brin, and Tim Cook, they would say that they are just trying to find ways to work with this administration. With Trump, that means money. That collection of dudes doesn’t like to think pay-for-play is a corrupting force, but it is.

None of this is new — just look at the army of paid lobbyists who make a living charging these companies a zillion dollars a year — but seeing it so nakedly (as Patel put it) is sobering. Tech CEOs may think they are doing what’s in the best interest of their companies and shareholders, but their actions do the rest of us — and the country — a disservice. I like to think that this keeps some of them up at night.

They may be able to get what they want out of Trump (for now, at least) by writing checks, “opening” a factory and putting on a show, and working the phones, but the leopards are coming for their faces eventually.

Sponsor: Simple Scan: Paper to PDF to Anywhere!

Do you love the Apple Notes document scanner, but would you like more flexibility in sending the scans to email, messages, files, or other apps? Then Simple Scan is for you. Simple Scan is the quick, easy way to scan paper documents to optimized, searchable PDF documents (or images) and send them almost anywhere.

Features include:

  • Same great scanning functionality as Apple Notes, but no need to clutter your notes data with one-off scans.
  • Creates high-resolution multi-page PDFs from your paper documents.
  • PDFs are searchable thanks to automatic Optical Character Recognition (OCR).
  • Built for simplicity. Just scan and send – no document library, no overly complicated array of settings
  • Send scans via email and messages. Or save to a file, or “Share” to send to other apps via the system share sheet.
  • Set up custom destinations with pre-filled recipients for easy “Email to Myself” and other common uses
  • Custom file destinations allow configuration of the file name and pre-selection of a destination folder to save the scan
  • Save scans directly to Photos.
  • Launches fast.
  • Never any ads or tracking. Ever.
  • Simple pricing. Choose a low-cost annual subscription or a one-time lifetime unlock!

Download and try Simple Scan for free today.

‘iOS Access for All’ Updated for iOS 18

Shelly Brisbin has a new update out for her book:

I’m pleased to announced that iOS Access for All (iOS 18 edition) is available now. As usual, there is more information than ever before. The book is fully updated for iOS 18 and the new iPhones and iPads that support it. There will also a new book format available soon, for those who don’t need images.

iOS 18 marks some incremental, but welcome upgrades to accessibility features, and to iOS as a whole. It also brings Apple Intelligence to the latest generation of phones. It’s all included, along with coverage of a number of updates Apple has made to iOS since first releasing iOS 18 last fall.

Reminders for watchOS Deserves a More Useful Complication

As is annual tradition around here, I have a request of the Reminders team. This time, it’s about the watchOS version of the app.

Take a look at these watch faces:

GoodTask vs. Reminders

The example on the left includes the GoodTask complication; the one on the right is from Reminders itself. GoodTask’s is much more useful, as it lets me see how many more tasks I have due with a simple glance.

Basically every watchOS task app has this as an option for a complication because it’s incredibly useful. In looking through the App Store, I was hard-pressed to find a good task app that doesn’t offer this feature.

This doesn’t have to add a lot of complexity to Reminders. The number shown on the complication should inherit the user’s settings for the application’s badge. This would make Reminders even more useful on the go. For those who don’t want this, the current complication could continue to work as-is.

This has been filed with Apple as Feedback FB17221430.

That Feeling When the Makers of Your Favorite Thunderbolt Dock Publish Some LLM Nonsense in a Press Release and You Miss When Products Could Just Be Products, Without AI

I recently linked to CalDigit’s line of new Thunderbolt 5 docks with excitement. Then, my buddy Jim Metzendorf sent me a link to this press release about the products. Just soak this in:

CalDigit’s new Element 5, is more than just a next-gen connectivity device—it’s a performance backbone built for the future of AI. With three fully-featured downstream Thunderbolt 5 ports and up to 120 Gbps of bandwidth, the Element 5 enables local developers and researchers to run large language models (LLMs) like Llama, Mistral, and Phi-2 at full speed, entirely offline.

Ehhhh…

Running quantized or full-precision models locally requires GPU horsepower—and the Element 5 delivers by enabling external GPU (eGPU) connectivity at full PCIe Gen 4 speeds. Whether you’re pairing a MacBook Pro with a high-end RTX 4090 in an enclosure, or distributing compute across multiple eGPUs, the Element 5’s three Thunderbolt 5 ports give you the freedom to scale.

This is particularly useful for local LLM inference, where token-per-second performance can double or triple with the right GPU pipeline in place. With Thunderbolt 5’s rock-solid throughput, model loading and execution remain fluid and responsive.

A couple of things here:

  1. Apple silicon Macs do not support eGPUs.
  2. Intel Macs that included this feature only supported AMD GPUs, so that RTX 4090 isn’t going to do you any good.

They go on:

Modern LLMs aren’t light. Models like Mistral-7B or fine-tuned Llama derivatives often require tens of gigabytes just to load into memory, not including embeddings, vector databases, or training datasets. The Element 5 supports Thunderbolt-connected NVMe SSDs that provide read/write speeds exceeding 3,000 MB/s, making it ideal for:

  • Storing and loading models quickly
  • Streaming large training or inference datasets
  • Running multiple AI tools without storage lag

🤷‍♂️

xAI Paying Far Less in Local Taxes Than Forecasted

When it was announced that xAI was coming to my hometown, I knew it was just a matter of time before we learned how our local leaders were going to get bamboozled. Looks like some of those chickens have come home to roost, according to Samuel Hardiman at The Daily Memphian:

Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence company is expected to pay more than $30 million in combined Memphis and Shelby County property taxes, according to records obtained by The Daily Memphian.

But the final property tax bill is significantly lower than what it could be based on xAI’s reported investment in Memphis, amounting to a tax break for a company that did not formally receive one.

The company is being taxed on a total investment of $2.2 billion, well shy of the $12 billion the Greater Memphis Chamber touted throughout the past year, according to its personal property tax card obtained by The Daily Memphian.

The lower tax bill is the result of the company and government working together to downplay xAI’s equipment in its overall taxes:

The lower-than-expected bill comes after local tax officials said they worked with the company to strategically shield equipment from being taxed. The process amounted to something similar to a tax break for a company that did not seek one upon arriving in Memphis and Shelby County last year.

Perfect.

This news comes on the heels of environmental and community groups saying that xAI has increased its usage of gas turbines without permission.

Sponsor: Magic Lasso Adblock, a Very Good YouTube Ad Blocker for Safari

Do you want to block all YouTube ads in Safari on your iPhone, iPad and Mac?

Then download Magic Lasso Adblock – the ad blocker designed for you.

Magic Lasso Adblock - YouTube

As an efficient, high performance and native Safari ad blocker, Magic Lasso blocks all intrusive ads, trackers and annoyances – delivering a faster, cleaner and more secure web browsing experience.

Magic Lasso Adblock is easy to setup, doubles the speed at which Safari loads and also blocks all YouTube ads; including all:

  • video ads
  • pop up banner ads
  • search ads
  • plus many more

With over 5,000 five star reviews; it’s simply the best ad blocker for your iPhone, iPad and Mac.

And unlike some other ad blockers, Magic Lasso Adblock respects your privacy, doesn’t accept payment from advertisers and is 100% supported by its community of users. 

So, join over 350,000 users and download Magic Lasso Adblock from the App Store, Mac App Store or via the Magic Lasso website.

iPadOS 19 Rumored to Bring Yet More Window Dressing

Several weeks ago we got some anonymous feedback in the Connected inbox, directed at Federico:

It’s a shame to hear that you’re going back to the Mac, because this year iPadOS is getting live window resizing and positioning, similar to macOS and visionOS 😉

We read the feedback on the show, not really knowing what to make of it. But it’s been a few years since Apple last tinkered with the iPad’s windowing system, so it’s safe to assume that is about time for more changes to arrive.

Enter Mark Gurman, who published this today:

Apple readies iPadOS 19 overhaul that will make the tablet’s software more like macOS. Besides a big effort to make the design of Apple’s operating systems more consistent, a big theme of the upcoming Worldwide Developers Conference is likely to be iPad software.

I’m told that this year’s upgrade will focus on productivity, multitasking and app window management — with an eye on the device operating more like a Mac. It’s been a long time coming, with iPad power users pleading with Apple to make the tablet more powerful.

Many of them, including myself, just wanted Apple to put macOS on the iPad. They won’t get their wish, but the changes will likely go far enough to make a lot of those users happy — at least for now. 

That certainly sounds like what our anonymous commenter was describing, and while it would be great for the iPad to gain a more Mac-like windowing system, I don’t think the people who want macOS on their iPads will look at iPadOS 19 and be truly satisfied.

Window management doesn’t address the core issue that has haunted the iPad since the beginning.

A year ago, as the M4 iPad Pro was rolling out, Federico Viticci took a look at the state of the iPad. Forgive the long block quote, but I think this still stands today:

The iPad is the only Apple computer that genuinely feels made for someone like me – a person who loves modularity, freedom, and the mix of touch and keyboard interactions. I share my frustrations because I care about the platform and want it to get better. But at the same time, we need to face reality: the iPad’s operating system isn’t improving at the speed the hardware deserves – that iPad owners who spent thousands of dollars on these machines deserve.

Something needs to change.

With new iPad Pros nearly upon us, it’s time to admit that iPadOS is not an operating system of the same caliber as Apple’s new hardware. iPadOS has been the victim of erratic updates over the years, with features that were meant to “reimagine” desktop computing only to get not even halfway there and be left to languish for years. Once again, I am not suggesting that the solution is to put macOS on iPad and call it a day. I’m saying that if that’s not in the cards, then Apple should consider all the ways iPadOS is still failing at basic computing tasks. I’d be okay with iPads running iPadOS forever. But if we passively accept that this is as good as an iPad can get, I strongly believe that we’ll play a role in letting Apple squander the greatest computer form factor they’ve ever created.

He goes on:

I’m tired of hearing apologies that smell of Stockholm syndrome from iPad users who want to invalidate these opinions and claim that everything is perfect. I’m tired of seeing this cycle start over every two years, with fantastic iPad hardware and the usual (justified), “But it’s the software…” line at the end. I’m tired of feeling like my computer is a second-class citizen in Apple’s ecosystem. I’m tired of being told that iPads are perfectly fine if you use Final Cut and Logic, but if you don’t use those apps and ask for more desktop-class features, you’re a weirdo, and you should just get a Mac and shut up. And I’m tired of seeing the best computer Apple ever made not live up to its potential.

I started using the iPad as my main computer when I was stuck in a hospital bed and couldn’t use a laptop. I kept using it because once you get a taste of that freedom, it’s hard to go back. I will continue using it because none of the alternatives match Apple’s hardware quality, app ecosystem, and pure delight. But loving something doesn’t mean ignoring its flaws. And iPadOS is a flawed operating system that still doesn’t get the basics right and, as a result, drags down the entire product line.

It’s been hard to argue against the iPad’s hardware for a long, long time, but as Federico points out, the “it’s the software” line is a refrain we’ve all heard over and over.

Back in 2010, it was a genius move on Apple’s part to have the iPad tie into the already-big-by-then-but-now-truly-massive iPhone app ecosystem. Despite claims of “It’s just a big iPhone!” many of us saw the potential in a computer that was a sheet of glass, able to turn into any app you wanted.

As the iPad got bigger and more capable, it was inevitable that people would demand more from it, but the iPad’s roots have held it back. Even after renaming iPhone OS to iOS, then forking iPadOS, the iPhone and iPad are very close cousins, and Apple is seemingly unwilling — or unable — to really push the iPad toward the Mac in terms of capability.

Files is a mere shadow of Finder. The audio and video routing on the iPad is a joke compared to what the Mac can do. Power users can build as many Shortcuts as they want, but the app may fail to sync them properly between devices. Need a utility running in the background all the time? Too bad. What is simple on a Mac often requires jumping through hoops on an iPad, despite the hardware being basically identical under the hood.

But Stephen, you may say, developers just need to write good, powerful software for iPadOS!

There are some shining examples of this, but more and more, the iPad is forgotten by developers. Again, we turn to Federico:

…with a few exceptions for Apple Pencil-based artistic tools like the incredible Procreate and note-taking apps like GoodNotes, when is the last time you saw a completely original iPad app for productivity that made you want to buy an iPad? Or that made you want to use the iPad version of an app instead of its macOS or web version?

Should the iPad app ecosystem really need to be reduced to the “Apple Pencil ecosystem” for it to stand out between the iPhone and the Mac?

The reality is that making groundbreaking iPad apps is a lost art and has been for a long time.

Blaming developers for the iPad’s slow progress isn’t fair, though. Yes, Apple has made creating an iPad app easier and easier over the years, but ultimately, the success of any platform lays at the feet of the platform owner. Apple’s App Store rules can be seen as stifling, and until Logic and Final Cut for iPad came along in recent years, Apple had never built a true professional app for the iPad. Files being bad is on Apple, not third-party developers. Shortcuts for the iPad not having the powerful escape hatches to AppleScript or even the shell isn’t the fault of users who are trying to speed up their work, but they pay the price for Apple’s instance that the iPad be a closed, sanitized system.

But Stephen, you may say, aren’t you glad Apple has returned its focus to the Mac with Apple silicon and solid macOS releases? Do you want to go back to the days where the laptops were bad and Apple seemed to think the iPad was the future of computing for everyone?

Despite the evidence in this case, I do think Apple can chew gum and walk at the same time. Apple could continue to keep its head down on the Mac and work to make the iPad a more capable computer. Even as a Mac guy, I wish it would.

Being able to to rearrange iPhone-class applications at will won’t make the iPad more useful in my workflow as a professional.