512 Pixels

Slam Dunk?

From AFP548’s Lion Server review:

Does this mean that OS X Lion Server is a slam dunk upgrade for everyone? No. In fact there are some folks that I don’t think I could even recommend to remain on the platform. If you are making a living doing web and mail hosting on Mac OS X Server then you are probably going to be better off moving to some other Unix or even Windows. The total gutting of web configuration when it comes to sites and virtual domains means you are going to be doing a lot of the same work in Apache2 conf files as you would be elsewhere. You can certainly get the job done on Lion Server and he price is right, but there just isn’t a compelling reason to do so.

For people that want to mange services for Mac, Windows, and iOS clients though Lion is fantastic. While the tools may have changed, the services that we’ve always had are all still here. Everything benefits from the upgrades of OS X Lion as well, with 64-bit now being the only way to go. The price is great and the install is simple.

Most impressively, you get a full blown MDM server for “free” with Lion Server. No developer account or third parties required. Just turn it on and go. This is bringing with it a huge shift in the way we think about client management on the Mac and I think the change will be for the better in the long run.

Lion Server Reviewed

Andrew Cunningham at AnandTech:

Lion Server’s main problem, from an IT person’s point of view, has less to do with the software’s functionality and more to do with Apple’s software support model. Lion Server is a good product that maintains most of the appeal of past OS X Server versions, but like the client version of Lion, it’s clearly a transitional product that makes many changes and foreshadows many more, and there’s less tolerance for that sort of thing in the server room than on the client end. If your organization depended on something like the Print or QuickTime Streaming service in Snow Leopard Server, or the ability to join Windows clients to Open Directory, Apple decided that those services were obsolete and got rid of them; now you’re stuck having to find something else to do the same work.

With the Server Admin Tools so clearly on their way out and Server.app not quite ready to pick up all the slack, the direction that OS X Server is headed isn’t very clear. It’s a good product today, but what will it be in two years? In five? This is the sort of thing that server admins, especially Windows server admins used to Microsoft’s longer guaranteed support cycles, worry about, and with Lion Server Apple isn’t doing much to allay those fears.

This 11,000 word review is well worth the time it takes to read if you depend on OS X Server. Like the client version of OS X, this really feels like a beginning and an end.

As Apple shifts more toward the consumer end of the spectrum, those of us with Xserves are feeling more and more like dinosaurs with each release. To say that I’m nervous about the future of OS X Server would be a massive understatement.

XP Slipping in Web Share

Peter Bright:

Another month rolls round, bringing with it another bunch of browser market share statistics. July was the first full month during which Firefox 5 was available, so it was the first indication of how well Mozilla’s new Rapid Release schedule would play in the market.

First the overall market share numbers. Internet Explorer is down 0.87 points to 52.81 percent. Firefox is down 0.19 points, to 21.48 percent. Chrome and Safari both made gains, of 0.34 and 0.57 points each, to 13.45 and 8.05 percent respectively. Finally, Opera fell slightly, by 0.08 points to 1.65 percent.

The day Internet Explorer ends its dominance, web designers around the world will celebrate. Standards should always win in the end.1


  1. Sadly, this isn’t always the case, and even when it is, progress is slow. ↩︎

The Sweet Spot

Jason Snell at Macworld:

The MacBook Air has never been a laptop for everyone. It began as a niche laptop for a tiny sliver of the population, but in the intervening three years there’s been a sea change. Today, most people in the market for a Mac laptop should seriously consider the MacBook Air. Sure, there are some people for whom it’s a poor fit—but I suspect they are increasingly the exception, not the rule. (There’s a reason Apple’s marketing slogan for this version of the Air is “The ultimate everyday notebook.”)

At just a hair below three pounds, the 13-inch MacBook Air will probably hit the sweet spot for users accustomed to larger computer screens. But for my money, the 11-inch Air is the real winner here. At $999, it’s now holding down the low-price end of the Apple laptop market. It will almost certainly be the laptop of choice for students, and they’ll love its light weight and small size.

Then upgrade it to an i7 processor with 4GB of RAM and a 256GB hard drive, attach it to an external display and peripherals via its Thunderbolt port, and you’ve got a tiny system with an amazing amount of power. The 11-inch MacBook Air might not be the perfect computer, but it’s as close to perfect as Apple’s ever come.

Compromise

Harry Reid, to the New York Times:

I am relieved to say that leaders from both parties have come together for the sake of our economy to reach a historic, bipartisan compromise that ends this dangerous standoff.

If the state of Ohio re-elects John Boehner, we should bomb it.

‘Old Mac of the Month’ Submissions

Since yesterday’s post by Kevin Lipe about the Performa 578, I’ve gotten several emails from you fine-looking readers wanting to write guests posts about old Macs you’re passionate about.

By all means, I would love to post your stories about old Macs!

So, get in touch. In your initial email, please indicate which Mac model you are planning to write about, so I don’t have systems covered more than once.

After we talk, please submit your work in Markdown or HTML. I will be editing posts to conform to AP style, and will link to your site or Twitter account in the Editor’s Note at the top of the post.

Thanks. You guys are the best.

Old Mac of the Month: Performa 578

Editor’s Note: I’m starting a new series named “Old Mac of the Month.” To help get things started, my buddy Kevin Lipe wrote up this piece about the Performa 578.

The Setup

Back in the bad old days of Apple, there were a lot of bad decisions being made about the Apple product line. What had in 1990 been the Macintosh SE, the Macintosh Plus, the Macintosh Portable, and the Macintosh II had ballooned into all kinds of different Macs for every price range. The “low cost” series were still the LC’s, the LC 550 and the LC 575. The powerhouse multimedia machines were the Quadras, the Centris series were the “business” machines, the Newton was a weird handheld thing that sort-of recognized handwriting, and PowerPC was on the horizon but not yet public. These were the days of System 7.5, when extensions were extensions and men were men.

Into this wilderness of terrible product confusion walked my parents, with two kids, one in elementary school and one about to be, knowing that the old Apple //e playing Oregon Trail wasn’t going to cut it anymore once their son, me, starting having to type stuff. They’d heard kids were going to have to type stuff on computers a lot going forward. They also knew some friends of ours with an SE/30 that I spent the better part of a summer mangling Kid Pix on.

So they went to Opus 2, one of the local Apple dealers here in Memphis, and they ended up walking out with a Performa 578, which still runs to this day.

Performa?

The Performa line was stuck between the LC line of cheap home computers and the Centris and Quadra lines of professional systems. In terms of hardware, they were similar to the pro systems, but they often featured the 68LC040 processor instead of the full-on 68040, which meant they had no floating point unit on the processor. They were tweaked and crippled in other weird ways too, just to make sure they weren’t really competitive with the pro-level systems.

They came with an absolute crapload of software. Our Performa 578 came with Quicken, ClarisWorks 2.1, At Ease, several shareware games, the Grolier Multimedia Encyclopedia CD-ROM, a Time Almanac CD-ROM,1 some sort of Microsoft CD-ROM about Dinosaurs, Mario Teaches Typing (which I never beat), and a free trial membership to Apple’s eWorld online service (which we were able to use with our 28.8kbps ADB-based modem).

It also came with the aforementioned modem, a Color StyleWriter Pro printer (which takes those weird old Canon Bubblejet cartridges), a whole stack of manuals and warranty cards and six-color Apple logo stickers, an ADB Mouse II (the rounded teardrop-shaped one, not the trapezoidal one), and the much-maligned AppleDesign keyboard.

For people who had never had a real desktop computer before, it was a lot of computer, especially in late 1994. The whole family took turns using it, Mom with her clip art, me with (mainly) Spectre Challenger and the Time Magazine CD-ROM, Dad with, well, whatever Dad did with the computer before the Internet—I guess maybe spreadsheets of the budget or something.

My “Book”

Around the fourth or fifth grade, I decided that I knew enough about ClarisWorks that I could handle it myself, and I decided to write a “book.” I distinctly remember the plot and perhaps also the characters being stolen lock, stock, and barrel from a Doonesbury book I’d checked out from the library2—but none of that mattered. I was a writer, and I was hard at work on my masterpiece. Somewhere, at my parents house, in an old box full of 3.5" Mac-formatted floppy disks, that thing still lives on. I wrote about forty pages of words before I realized that I couldn’t write anything else. I’d written as much as I could.

It was my first real experience with being lost in the act of creation, even though it wasn’t very creative and it certainly wasn’t very good. I shut myself off in that back room with that Performa, gazing into it’s 9-inch all-seeing eye, refusing to go outside and play or go play in my room or even go read books in bed (something I still hardly ever shy away from) because I was in the zone. I was out there. I was writing a “book.”3

Futureproof

I used that Performa as my main computer until I was in the eighth grade, when my parents broke down and got a Gateway 20004 because “everything is going to Windows.” This turned out to not be true, since right as I was finishing up high school was when the big Mac turnaround started, when you started seeing iBooks and PowerBooks popping up in classrooms and on campuses again. But the Performa just wasn’t cutting it anymore…

…except for my Mom. She never learned how to use the PC, and she kept typing letters and other documents on that Performa 578 and printing them out on the Color StyleWriter Pro (for which you could still get the cartridges since they were the Canon Bubblejet cartridges) until 2002 or 2003, when we got our next Family Mac: an iMac G4 17", the widescreen lampshade with the 1GHz G4 processor. It ran Jaguar, but the discs that came with it were OS X 10.1. It was weird compared to our System 7 Mac, and more complicated, but it was beautiful to look at, and I quickly started diving into the Unix internals of the thing.

And I haven’t been the same since.

But. If I hadn’t had that Performa 578 to introduce me to the basics of the Mac, and to teach me that computers have things to teach us, and that they can be a tool for finding the better aspects of ourselves within the words we’re pouring out onto an invisible page, who knows where I’d be. Probably using some crappy Gateway for spreadsheets, or worse.


  1. This Time CD-ROM included all kinds of mind-boggling multimedia probably not fit for a seven-year-old: footage of the explosion of the Hindenburg, a slideshow featuring the highlights of the Vietnam and Gulf Wars, several decades worth of printable Time articles (which I was too young to understand but most of which I printed and read anyway)—the thing was a treasure trove for a boy curious about the world beyond suburban Memphis. ↩︎

  2. I know, right? A fifth grader pretentious/smart enough to be reading and half-understanding Doonesbury is a pretty insufferable fifth-grader, huh? ↩︎

  3. If I remember correctly, we were out of black ink in the Color StyleWriter Pro, so I couldn’t actually print the thing out when I was done with it, which was a minor tragedy. ↩︎

  4. Yes, they were still called Gateway 2000 at that time, and we bought it at a Gateway Country retail store. ↩︎

nvAlt Updated for Lion

Brett Tepstra:

This version adds a plethora of new features, including better MultiMarkdown 3 support, Simplenote tag sync (and a fix for Lion syncing), the ability to lock a note to the preview window while editing another, auto-pairing and wrapping and quite a few bug fixes.

So glad to be able to put this back in my Dock.