What if Apple were added to the Dow Jones?⇢

Adam Nash:

As of September 17, 2012, AAPL closed at 699.781/share. As it turns out, if Dow Jones had added Apple instead of Cisco in 2009, the index would now be at 16,617.82. Hard to think that hitting all new highs wouldn’t be material for market psychology and the election.

Without Apple, the Dow sits at 13,553.10. It seems silly to me not to include Apple, and it really speaks volumes that a group of people thought Cisco was the way to go.

Continue reading ⇢

NYC Fox affiliate blows iPhone 5 story⇢

Michael Rose at TUAW:

As pointed out by 9to5Mac, the coverage package of interviews with line-waiters at the 5th Avenue store who are anticipating the Friday launch took a rather surreal turn. The reporter breathlessly cites “a laser keyboard and holographic images” for the new iPhone, as a clip plays showing those capabilities.

It seems Fox’s lack of concern for truthful reporting extends beyond politics.

Continue reading ⇢

Some quick thoughts on Apple’s new EarPods

I’m an over-the-ear kinda guy — my Sennheiser HD–280 PRO headphones are never far away.

The older Apple earbuds simply don’t fit well in my ears, leaving me with a distaste for earbuds in general. When I do use earbuds, I use a pair of the original high-end Apple ones, with the smallest fitting.

I might have girly inner-ears. Don’t judge.

The EarPods are a huge improvement for me. They are comfortable and fit in my ears quite comfortably. Sound-wise, they seem on-par with my nice Apple ‘buds, and a good bit better than Apple’s previous built-ins. Mids and bass sound far more distinct than before, and highs sound less tinny.

Continue reading ⇢

The Timid Nano⇢

Nilay Patel at The Verge:

The MP3 player market is dead, and Apple doesn’t seem to know how to move on.

There was a glimmer of hope a year ago, when Apple updated the previous watch-sized iPod nano with new clock displays and even began selling nano watch bands in its retail stores. The nano wasn’t a very good watch, but the potential was blindingly obvious — it was Bluetooth and a connectivity protocol away from being the ultimate iPhone accessory. It felt like a brewing revolution in wearable computing that guaranteed an extra $149 in revenue from every iPhone owner.

Continue reading ⇢