Chamberlain Shuts the (Garage) Door on API Access

Jennifer Pattison Tuohy, writing at The Verge:

The Chamberlain Group — owners of the MyQ smart garage door controller tech — has announced it’s shut off all “unauthorized access” to its APIs. The move breaks the smart home integrations of thousands of users who relied on platforms such as Homebridge and Home Assistant to do things like shut the garage door when they lock their front door or flash a light if they leave their door open for 10 minutes, or whatever other control or automation they wanted to do with the device they bought and paid for.

The move comes a year after Chamberlain discontinued its official Apple HomeKit integration and a few months after it finally killed support for Google Assistant. It’s sadly another example of how the company continues to be hostile to the interoperable smart home.

Thankfully there are some alternatives out there, as Tuohy writes. Personally, I’ve been happy with my Meross setup.

Adding a Driveway Gate to HomeKit

A couple of weeks ago, I wrote about my latest attempt to add my older garage door opener to HomeKit.

That project has been a huge hit with everyone in my household, so emboldened, I recently took on an additional HomeKit project: adding our driveway gate to the network.

When I first had the idea, I assumed that I would need to piece something together on my own, but then I came across a product called the ismartgate. After poking around the website for a few minutes, I came across this really great configuration page. After checking a few boxes, the website told me that the ismartgate LITE would work for my needs. $130 and a few days later, I was ready to go.

Compared to installing the Meross, this was shockingly straightforward. The main unit plugged into a spare power outlet located inside of my gate’s control box, and I had to run a total of just two wires to the control board:

Wiring Diagram

With the brains of the ismartgate squared away, I now had to set up the magnetic sensor so it would know if the gate was opened or closed. After some tinkering, I ended up mounting them on the hinged portion of the gate:

Gate Sensors

When the gate is closed, the surface with the magnet rotates, coming near the sensor, which is battery powered. I was able to mount it using some strong double-sided foam tape and one of the two screws used to hold the laser emitter in place.1

Getting the ismartgate LITE added to HomeKit was very simple, but it serves as a reminder that Apple doesn’t ship near enough icons to choose from in the Home app. Visually, it and my garage door look the same, which is a bit annoying.

Also annoying is how Siri treats the names of rooms and accessories. I put the “Garage Door” in a room called “Garage” in HomeKit. That worked really well until I added the “Gate” to the same room. Then, Siri wanted me to clarify what I meant when I said “Open the garage door.” Until I can dive into that further, I’ve moved the gate into its own room.

That hiccup aside, I’ve been really happy with my two recent HomeKit additions. In both cases, a relatively cheap accessory — that can be easily uninstalled — has made life just a little bit nicer here at the Hackett house.


  1. This is less cool than it sounds — it’s used to make sure that nothing is in the path of the gate as it closes. If something crosses the beam, the gate stops immediately. 

Garage Door HomeKit, Take Two

Three years ago, I installed the Insignia Wi-Fi Garage Door Controller, which allowed me to check the status of my garage door — and control it — via HomeKit.

After that blog post was published, I heard from several people saying that they had done the same thing, just to be disappointed when the Insignia hardware failed on them within the first year or two of use.

I’m sad to say that the same thing happened to me, so for the last year or so, I’ve been opening my garage door with its old-school remote like an animal.

This issue was so widespread that Insignia has discontinued the product.

Recently, some folks in the Relay FM Member Discord were discussing a HomeKit garage door kit made by Meross. The company makes a wide-range of HomeKit-enabled gear, all of which seems to be well-liked so I spent the $50 for the kit.

Installation was pretty straight-forward. Unlike the Insignia, which had a module that attached to the garage door to work out its orientation, the Meross uses a set of small magnetic sensors to know when the door is closed. As the door opens and moves up the track, the sensors lose contact with each other, and the system knows that the door is open.

The stationary side of the sensor pair is hard-wired to the base unit, and doesn’t require separate power or batteries. I like the simplicity of that, even if it meant needing to run wire from the sensor back to the small base unit, which I mounted to the top of the garage door opener. My garage is unfinished, so it wasn’t a big deal with to run the wire, especially with Myke Hurley making sure my ladder didn’t move out from under me.

The other wiring required was to two terminals on the garage door opener itself. These terminals are also used for the wired button in the garage, so this was just a matter of backing the screw out on each terminal, then slipping the new wires into place. My opener is from the 90s, but didn’t give me any trouble during the installation.

The base unit plugs into power via USB-A and a small power brick. No batteries needed.

The opener requires the Meross app for set up and firmware updates, which isn’t a dealbreaker for me. It’s been shuttled off into the App Library forever, but now my garage door shows up in the Home app, right next to a bunch of other stuff around the house:

HomeKit Garage Door

HomeKit Secure Video is Buggy and Frustrating

Last week, a beta version of firmware for the Logitech Circle 2 cameras enabled use with HomeKit Secure video. As the user of a couple of Nest cameras, I’ve been keeping an eye on this, as storing footage in my iCloud account is quite appealing. I bought a Circle 2 camera on Amazon and set it up over the weekend.

I didn’t get very far before bugging Zac Hall at 9to5 Mac, as he writes:

HomeKit Secure Video cameras can be set to record clips and stream video, only stream, or turned off individually, and each mode can be assigned to when people are home or away.

But something Stephen Hackett asked me over the weekend is if it’s possible to turn cameras on and off without location. In his case, he would like to use HomeKit Secure Video in his detached home office when he’s not inside, but geofencing control isn’t an option since the house and office are too close.

You can manually turn a camera on and off by digging through the camera’s settings in the Home app, but that’s just not smart home automation. My suggestion was connecting the HomeKit Secure Video camera to a HomeKit smart plug as a workaround. It’s not as elegant as it should be, but it’s a solution for now.

Hall goes on to write about some of the other frustrating issues with HomeKit Secure Video, and on Connected this week, we spoke about it at length, starting at 1:06:53.

In short, this product doesn’t feel ready. Notifications are buggy, the motion sensitivity on the camera is way too high and it lacks many features found with competing products.

I also worry about HomeKit Secure Video being one feature of one app Apple ships. For companies like Nest and Ring, it’s the feature of the app they ship.1 I don’t want to have to wait until iOS 14 for Apple to fix what’s broken in HomeKit Secure Video, and honestly, I shouldn’t have to. If Apple wants to compete with these products, it should.


  1. There’s another conversation to be had about the fact that Ring is owned by Amazon and Nest by Google, but that’s for another day. I’m really just comparing features here. 

Review: Insignia Wi-Fi Garage Door Controller for HomeKit

In a recent stay with John Voorhees, I noticed him asking Siri to open his garage door. He told me he was using the Insignia Wi-Fi Garage Door Controller, which he reviewed for MacStories earlier this year.

As someone who frequently worries about having left the garage door up after leaving, I knew this was a device I needed to check out, so I ordered one on the spot.

The controller is actually two separate components. The first plugs into power and runs small wires into the garage door opener itself:

The other part is a wireless transmitter that attaches to the garage door to tell HomeKit if the door is open or closed:

Setup was pretty straight forward. I had to take the panel off my door opener — after unplugging it, of course — and back out two screws to slip a new pair of wires onto the contacts. This method will vary opener to opener, but was easy enough on mine.

The beauty of this approach is that all other methods of opening and closing the door continue to work. In my garage’s case, that’s a pair of old-school wireless remotes and a doorbell-like button in the garage itself.

Those small wires join and plug into the main unit, which has a HomeKit barcode on the side to join it to the wireless network. I have pretty good coverage in my garage, but even so, the opener can be slow at times to report its status back to HomeKit, but more on that later.

Unlike many HomeKit devices, the Insignia doesn’t require its own iOS app to function; it talks directly to HomeKit and shows up in the Home app and is accessible via Siri. All of this just works without any configuration past adding the HomeKit device to the Home app.

In addition to the HomeKit and Siri control, the opener will send a push notification when the status of the door changes. These can be adjusted to be sent only during certain times of day or if certain people are or are not home.

My only complaint is that the device can be a little slow to respond to commands, and the UI in Home takes a moment to update after the door has changed status. The speed is by no means a deal breaker to have access to your garage door anywhere in the world, but it is a little annoying.

At the end of the day, the Insigina Garage Door Controller does what it advertises: puts your garage door on HomeKit with minimal fuss or disruption. HomeKit continues its slow march toward being a powerful, trustworthy system, and this is just another example of the ecosystem continuing to become more useful.

HomeKit Support Added to IKEA Trådfri Smart Lighting System (Updated)

Tim Hardwick at MacRumors is reporting that IKEA's Trådfri smart lighting system now support Apple's HomeKit.

The lights require a Ethernet-based gateway, not unlike the Philips Hue bridge, although Hardwick also reports that the Trådfri bulbs can work with a Hue bridge.

The bulbs run anywhere from $12 to $18 a pop, which is roughly what Philip's dimmable LED bulbs cost.

Update: Turns out, MacRumors was incorrect. IKEA says support is coming this fall.

On HomeKit vs. Alexa

Jacob Kastrenakes at The Verge:

Apple never shows up to CES, but the last couple years, it’s still managed to have a quiet presence through HomeKit. That’s true this year, too, but it’s been really quiet, failing to drum up anywhere near the excitement of something like Amazon’s Alexa.

[…]

CES is where that tends to change, as companies building HomeKit gadgets turn up to show off their newest products. This year, there are more than a dozen companies presenting HomeKit devices — but, for better or worse, they’re all pretty boring.

I’ve been very impressed with Alexa. We’ve had an Echo in our kitchen for months, and I recently picked up an Echo Dot to put in my studio.

It’s an open platform, meaning developers can write applications — dubbed Skills — that users can enable with just a tap in the Alexa mobile app.

I’ve added a bunch of Skills to our account. We can listen to Spotify, control our Hue lights, change our Nest thermostat, ask a Magic 8 ball questions, add stuff to Todoist and more.

HomeKit, on the other hand, is a closed system. Apple has a rigorous approval process before allowing a device or service to be listed as a supported partner. From a security standpoint, this is a big win.

For example, before Nest had an official Skill, there were a handful of third-party ones that claimed to offer control of Nest hardware via Alexa. I steered clear of those, as I didn’t want a third-party developer I didn’t know in between me and thermostat or security cameras.1

The downside is exactly what The Verge points out. When compared directly, it’s hard to argue that HomeKit is as exciting as Alexa.

However, I think that’s unfair to both systems. With Alexa, Amazon is building a voice-driven ecosystem to rival Google Assistant or Siri. Controlling home automation devices is a vitally important part of that ecosystem, but it’s not the whole pie.


  1. A side effect of using both Apple and Amazon’s systems is realizing just how much stuff works with both. Nest — founded and formerly run by “Father of the iPod” Tony Fadell — is an exception, with no HomeKit support in site.