512 Pixels

On Installing 10.6

Topher Kessler over at MacFixIt has posted an article on installing Snow Leopard, and it reveals some interesting changes:

Inserting the Snow Leopard DVD I double-clicked the install icon, expecting to have it reboot to the DVD as all other OS X installations have required. This was not the case with Snow Leopard, which instead launched a grey-themed installer program that allowed for me to select various options such as printer drivers, QuickTime 7, and Rosetta, all while OS X 10.5 was still running in the background. There are no options to select the installation method (archive and install, or otherwise), which was rumored to be the case before Snow Leopard’s release. In order to do a clean install, you click the “Utilities” button and the installer will then boot directly to the DVD and allow you to use Disk Utility to format your hard drive. Quicktime 7 is installed by default and can be deselected, but on the contrary Rosetta is not checked by default, which is surprising because it is only a single 1.9MB application; however, having it this way clearly shows Apple’s progressive intent to move away from PowerPC. I decided to install Rosetta because a variety of utilities and other packages I use are still PowerPC only.

Macworld Reviews Snow Leopard

Jason Snell:

Snow Leopard is Apple’s lowest-priced OS update in eight years. Granted, it’s a collection of feature tweaks and upgrades, as well as under-the-hood modifications that might not pay off for users immediately. But the price of upgrading is so low that I’ve really got to recommend it for all but the most casual, low-impact Mac users. If you’ve got a 32-bit Intel Mac (that is, one powered by a Core Solo or Core Duo processor), the benefit of this upgrade will be a little less. But for most Mac users, especially the kind of person who reads a Web site devoted to the subject, the assorted benefits of Snow Leopard outweigh the price tag. I’d pay $30 just for the improved volume ejection, the ability to create services with Automator, and the improvements to the Dock and Exposé — though I admit I’d pay slightly more to not have the misguided QuickTime Player X as a part of the package. If you’re a user who connects to an Exchange server every day, upgrading to Snow Leopard really is a no-brainer. For everyone else, maybe it’s not quite a no-brainer — but it’s awfully close. Snow Leopard is a great value, and any serious Mac user should upgrade now.

I agree — there’s really no reason to sit out this update for the majority of Mac users.

Adobe and Snow Leopard

Adobe has posted a .pdf outlining the current state of compatibility between Snow Leopard and their products:

Working closely with Apple, Adobe has tested and determined that our Adobe Creative Suite 4 products and components are compatible with Mac OS X Snow Leopard.

[…]

Older versions of Adobe creative software were not included in our testing efforts. While older Adobe and Macromedia applications may install and run on Mac OS X Snow Leopard (v10.6), they were designed, tested, and released to the public several years before this new operating system became available. You may therefore experience a variety of installation, stability, and reliability issues for which there is no resolution. Older versions of our creative software will not be updated to support Mac OS X Snow Leopard (v10.6).

In my experience, CS3 runs just fine under Snow Leopard, but older users, be aware you may come across some bugs.

Wow. Just Wow.

Watch Jason Calacanis’ rant all the way through:

I’ve watched this three times today, and am still not sure where to start.

His main point goes something like this: Apple and its founder Steve Jobs are sellouts because their closed systems have become popular. Oh yeah, and all of those people who buy into this are idiots.

To answer Calacanis’ rant, I’ve broken this down into several different chunks.

Apple: The Rebels

Back in 1970s and 80s, Apple was rebelling against IBM, whose mainframe computer systems were only available to business people and university staff. No one had a computer at home — there mere idea of it was laughable.

But to Jobs, Woz and the others present at Apple’s birth and meteoric rise, the idea was a dream. Having a computer on in every classroom and every home meant the average person could have access to what only a few had access to before. They saw themselves as the Robin Hoods of the Silicon Valley — bringing to the common man that which was once only reserved for the elite.

This photo sums it up nicely.

The Closed System

While the Apple II that preceded it was very open, the Macintosh was a closed system, much like a household appliance. It helped the average consumer embrace the personal computer. With the guts hidden under the CRT, the computer looked far less scary.

Not to mention the fundamental reason Apple’s systems are clsed: with a closed box and closed software, Jobs and his team could guarantee a good, consistent experience across millions of users.

That’s the same reason Apple’s products are closed today. The iPod and iPhone sync so well with computers because Apple designed them to work hand-in-hand. Apple’s hardware works so damn well because they control the software as well. The fundamental flaw in Windows is that Microsoft has to write an OS that can run on literally thousands of machines. With Snow Leopard, Apple only has to worry about 25 or so models. Guess which one has fewer problems.

Living in a world where Apple makes most of the choices isn’t a bad thing — they usually make good ones. Yes, Apple products have compromises. The new notebooks, for example, all have built-in batteries. This means I can’t pop a spare in and keep going, but with the advances Apple has made where it comes to battery life, I don’t need to carry a spare battery. And when Apple blows it, they usually fix it. Even with the App Store, Apple seems intent on making things right.

The iPhone as a Closed System

Yes, Apple has botched things over and over with the App Store. Yes, AT&T sucks. Yes, some in the iPhone using-community long for more.

That said, the iPhone — by its very nature — is the most open mobile platform on the planet. Very few other handheld makers allow — nay, encourage — users to download apps that can do almost anything to run on their devices.

Yes, there are a few things the App Store doesn’t allow for — leading some to call Apple out as a monster, controlling every aspect of their users’ experiences.

For those people, jailbreaking is the alternative. Those of us who jailbreak our devices do so for very specific reasons, but we’re the fringe. The large majority of iPhone users will never even know what “jailbreaking” means.

The thing that makes me chuckle is that very few people actually get upset about this enough to stop using the iPhone. A jailbroken iPhone is still an iPhone, still an Apple product, which means Apple still makes money off of it. If you want open, go by an Android-power phone and suffer through the poor user interface and lack of applications.

The Sellouts

In many, many ways the Apple of 1994 and the Apple of today are different companies. In 1984, they were a tiny operation trying to face down Big Blue, with the odds stacked against them. Today, they are a wildly successful — and profitable — company.

With their growth, Apple has changed. They aren’t the rebels anymore. They don’t have to be — there isn’t a Big Blue threatening to dominate the entire technological landscape. There isn’t an entire generation of computer users who grew up in their garages soldering chips onto boards, praying for a system they can buy and be proud to own.

In short, there aren’t any Goliaths, so Apple doesn’t have to be David anymore.

Sure, Microsoft has the majority of market when it comes to OS installs, but even being small, Apple is making money like very few companies are these days. And when it comes to digital music, music players and smart phones, Apple is king of the hill, without a doubt. Microsoft simply can’t compete with iTunes, the iPod and the iPhone.

Everything in the computer industry changed after the Macintosh in 1984, including Apple. In some ways, Apple has become the establishment. Many, many companies envy Apple’s position and have their guns aimed for Cupertino. But just because they’re on top doesn’t mean they don’t make great products. It doesn’t mean they’ve sold out. It doesn’t mean that Apple fans are idiots or hypocrites. However, it does mean that people who just don’t get it get angry.

Mr. Calacanis, I’m looking at you.

Palm OS HotSync Conduit Dropped in 10.6

AppleInsider:

Apple has discontinued support for legacy Palm OS devices in Mac OS X Snow Leopard’s iSync 3.1.0, according to sources familiar with the latest Gold Master build, requiring users of Palm OS devices to obtain third party support for syncing their Palm Desktop information with Mac OS X’s Sync Services.

Of course, this conduit wasn’t built by Palm — Apple built it into iSync starting back in 10.4 in an attempt to make the Mac more approachable to the business world that — then, at least — ran on the Palm OS to a very large degree.

Today, there are fewer and fewer Palm OS devices out there, and more and more smart phones that can sync with the Mac via software written by the phone’s manufacturer ( such as RIM’s “BlackBerry for Mac” software) or software like The Missing Sync, which looks like the only option available for users of both the Palm OS and Snow Leopard.

The biggest elephant in the room — the iPhone — of course syncs via iTunes, cutting out the middle man entirely.

I see this as pretty much the final nail in iSync’s coffin. The list of supported devices under Leopard iSync includes some pretty old and obscure phones, whose user base is declining. I suspect 10.7 won’t include iSync at all.

The X is Dead

Gizmodo has published a collection of photos showing the various retail boxes OS X has come packaged in over the last 8 year.

With the release of 10.6 this Friday, Apple is going to be taking a big step away from the “X” themed boxes. Instead, the Snow Leopard retail box features, well, a snow leopard.

Gizmodo complains about this:

I can haz clip art? Come on, Apple. What’s wrong with you?

While I’ll miss the “X” art, the photo Apple is using of a snow leopard is far from basic clipart — it’s actually a stunning photograph. It’s sad to see the X go, but this isn’t a bad alternative.

Support ForkBombr

All ForkBombr content is — and will remain — free. That said, I pay the bills for this thing out of my own pocket. If you like what you read here, feel free to help pitch in. I’ve added a “Support ForkBombr” link to the sidebar. Past that, I’m not going to annoy you with this. As always, thanks for reading.

Here’s how you can help:

1. Buy stuff from Amazon

I’ve set up a custom store of some stuff I like. Take a look, and if you purchase anything, I get a cut. If you don’t see anything you like, you can visit Amazon via this link and I get a cut.

2. Donate via PayPal

If you don’t need to buy anything, but are just feeling generous, you can use PayPal to send funds. It’s secure and easy. Here’s a link.

On White Boxes

Frank Fox, over at LowEndMac:

There are many smaller brands and millions of generic no-name desktop computers call “white boxes” that get sold every year. All of these generic computers fly under the radar, and no one keeps track of what is going on. It is a perfect place to hide a million or so Hackintoshes from public scrutiny - and especially from Microsoft.

An extra million copies of Mac OS X 10.6 sold will look like more people are upgrading from Mac OS X 10.5. Analysts will just report how great Apple is doing getting people to switch. But Apple will have the actual sales data, and it will be able to spot any unusual trends.

A million Hackintoshes should not go unnoticed. They have probably estimated within a few percent exactly how many people will switch.

In order for Apple to see the spike in demand, everyone needs to wait a few months and then buy the full copy (not the upgrade). This will send a strong message to Apple when it sees the spike in full copy sales. (It’s even better if you buy the family pack and build five Hackintoshes.)

Apple is a software company, but it’s also a hardware company — their software just drives people to buy Macs. Doing this would cripple the company.

Apple Posts Their Response to the FCC

In a shockingly transparent move, Apple has posted their response to the FCC’s inquiry into the company’s removal of Google Voice apps from the App Store. Here’s a sample:

Apple alone makes the final decisions to approve or not approve iPhone applications.

There is a provision in Apple’s agreement with AT&T that obligates Apple not to include functionality in any Apple phone that enables a customer to use AT&T’s cellular network service to originate or terminate a VoIP session without obtaining AT&T’s permission. Apple honors this obligation, in addition to respecting AT&T’s customer Terms of Service, which, for example, prohibit an AT&T customer from using AT&T’s cellular service to redirect a TV signal to an iPhone. From time to time, AT&T has expressed concerns regarding network efficiency and potential network congestion associated with certain applications, and Apple takes such concerns into consideration.

It’s long, but a good look into the world of App Store approvals.