512 Pixels

Old Mac of the Month: Performa 578

Editor’s Note: I’m starting a new series named “Old Mac of the Month.” To help get things started, my buddy Kevin Lipe wrote up this piece about the Performa 578.

The Setup

Back in the bad old days of Apple, there were a lot of bad decisions being made about the Apple product line. What had in 1990 been the Macintosh SE, the Macintosh Plus, the Macintosh Portable, and the Macintosh II had ballooned into all kinds of different Macs for every price range. The “low cost” series were still the LC’s, the LC 550 and the LC 575. The powerhouse multimedia machines were the Quadras, the Centris series were the “business” machines, the Newton was a weird handheld thing that sort-of recognized handwriting, and PowerPC was on the horizon but not yet public. These were the days of System 7.5, when extensions were extensions and men were men.

Into this wilderness of terrible product confusion walked my parents, with two kids, one in elementary school and one about to be, knowing that the old Apple //e playing Oregon Trail wasn’t going to cut it anymore once their son, me, starting having to type stuff. They’d heard kids were going to have to type stuff on computers a lot going forward. They also knew some friends of ours with an SE/30 that I spent the better part of a summer mangling Kid Pix on.

So they went to Opus 2, one of the local Apple dealers here in Memphis, and they ended up walking out with a Performa 578, which still runs to this day.

Performa?

The Performa line was stuck between the LC line of cheap home computers and the Centris and Quadra lines of professional systems. In terms of hardware, they were similar to the pro systems, but they often featured the 68LC040 processor instead of the full-on 68040, which meant they had no floating point unit on the processor. They were tweaked and crippled in other weird ways too, just to make sure they weren’t really competitive with the pro-level systems.

They came with an absolute crapload of software. Our Performa 578 came with Quicken, ClarisWorks 2.1, At Ease, several shareware games, the Grolier Multimedia Encyclopedia CD-ROM, a Time Almanac CD-ROM,1 some sort of Microsoft CD-ROM about Dinosaurs, Mario Teaches Typing (which I never beat), and a free trial membership to Apple’s eWorld online service (which we were able to use with our 28.8kbps ADB-based modem).

It also came with the aforementioned modem, a Color StyleWriter Pro printer (which takes those weird old Canon Bubblejet cartridges), a whole stack of manuals and warranty cards and six-color Apple logo stickers, an ADB Mouse II (the rounded teardrop-shaped one, not the trapezoidal one), and the much-maligned AppleDesign keyboard.

For people who had never had a real desktop computer before, it was a lot of computer, especially in late 1994. The whole family took turns using it, Mom with her clip art, me with (mainly) Spectre Challenger and the Time Magazine CD-ROM, Dad with, well, whatever Dad did with the computer before the Internet—I guess maybe spreadsheets of the budget or something.

My “Book”

Around the fourth or fifth grade, I decided that I knew enough about ClarisWorks that I could handle it myself, and I decided to write a “book.” I distinctly remember the plot and perhaps also the characters being stolen lock, stock, and barrel from a Doonesbury book I’d checked out from the library2—but none of that mattered. I was a writer, and I was hard at work on my masterpiece. Somewhere, at my parents house, in an old box full of 3.5" Mac-formatted floppy disks, that thing still lives on. I wrote about forty pages of words before I realized that I couldn’t write anything else. I’d written as much as I could.

It was my first real experience with being lost in the act of creation, even though it wasn’t very creative and it certainly wasn’t very good. I shut myself off in that back room with that Performa, gazing into it’s 9-inch all-seeing eye, refusing to go outside and play or go play in my room or even go read books in bed (something I still hardly ever shy away from) because I was in the zone. I was out there. I was writing a “book.”3

Futureproof

I used that Performa as my main computer until I was in the eighth grade, when my parents broke down and got a Gateway 20004 because “everything is going to Windows.” This turned out to not be true, since right as I was finishing up high school was when the big Mac turnaround started, when you started seeing iBooks and PowerBooks popping up in classrooms and on campuses again. But the Performa just wasn’t cutting it anymore…

…except for my Mom. She never learned how to use the PC, and she kept typing letters and other documents on that Performa 578 and printing them out on the Color StyleWriter Pro (for which you could still get the cartridges since they were the Canon Bubblejet cartridges) until 2002 or 2003, when we got our next Family Mac: an iMac G4 17", the widescreen lampshade with the 1GHz G4 processor. It ran Jaguar, but the discs that came with it were OS X 10.1. It was weird compared to our System 7 Mac, and more complicated, but it was beautiful to look at, and I quickly started diving into the Unix internals of the thing.

And I haven’t been the same since.

But. If I hadn’t had that Performa 578 to introduce me to the basics of the Mac, and to teach me that computers have things to teach us, and that they can be a tool for finding the better aspects of ourselves within the words we’re pouring out onto an invisible page, who knows where I’d be. Probably using some crappy Gateway for spreadsheets, or worse.


  1. This Time CD-ROM included all kinds of mind-boggling multimedia probably not fit for a seven-year-old: footage of the explosion of the Hindenburg, a slideshow featuring the highlights of the Vietnam and Gulf Wars, several decades worth of printable Time articles (which I was too young to understand but most of which I printed and read anyway)—the thing was a treasure trove for a boy curious about the world beyond suburban Memphis. ↩︎

  2. I know, right? A fifth grader pretentious/smart enough to be reading and half-understanding Doonesbury is a pretty insufferable fifth-grader, huh? ↩︎

  3. If I remember correctly, we were out of black ink in the Color StyleWriter Pro, so I couldn’t actually print the thing out when I was done with it, which was a minor tragedy. ↩︎

  4. Yes, they were still called Gateway 2000 at that time, and we bought it at a Gateway Country retail store. ↩︎

nvAlt Updated for Lion

Brett Tepstra:

This version adds a plethora of new features, including better MultiMarkdown 3 support, Simplenote tag sync (and a fix for Lion syncing), the ability to lock a note to the preview window while editing another, auto-pairing and wrapping and quite a few bug fixes.

So glad to be able to put this back in my Dock.

Government has less cash than Apple

Matt Hartley:

As Republicans and Democrats continue to work towards a compromise to the country’s debt ceiling crisis, the U.S. Treasury Department said on Thursday that Washington now has a total operating balance of only US$73.768-billion.

Meanwhile, Apple currently boasts a cash reserve of US$75.876-billion, as of its most recent quarterly earnings report at the end of June.

Of course, the numbers aren’t directly comparable; the government’s number represents how much financial headroom it has before bumping up against an arbitrary debt ceiling, while Apple’s cash reserve represents the pile of money the Cupterino, California-based company has available on its balance sheet.

Well, crap.

On the iPhone 5 and Nuance

While recording this week’s Bro Show, I had a thought about the iPhone 5.

I have been wondering for weeks now what Apple could add to the iPhone at this point, from a hardware perspective. Clearly, things like a faster processor and better camera are on tap for future models, but I really can’t think of a single “it” feature that would knock things out of the park.

Then, I had it.

What if Apple makes all of the Nuance-powered voice stuff that keeps popping up in the iOS 5 betas iPhone 5-only?

This makes sense to me for a couple of reasons.

First, no real changes have been made thus far in the iOS 5 betas when it comes to voice, and Apple hasn’t said a single word publicly about its Nuance partnership. Why not show it off at WWDC, even in a very un-released fashion? The only reason I can think of for the company to hold its tongue on what would be a great feature is that it is tied to unreleased hardware. (Granted, Apple does like having a secret feature to show off close to release.)

Secondly, by building this technology to run on an A5 chip or better, Apple instantly has its “headlining feature” for a new iPhone model this fall. The iPhone 4 has been a smashing success, and while the new model will be an even bigger success if history teaches us anything, Apple probably wants more than a case redesign and an A5 chip to show off to customers.

Nuance’s software may require an A5 to run as smoothly as Apple would like, too. Android does voice-stuff in the cloud, but I’d imagine Apple would prefer if all the operations could take place locally, without a network connection.

Voice-powered commands aren’t new to the mobile scene, of course. Google has baked-in voice command to Android for some time now. When (if) Apple ships something comparable, I’m sure it will be executed in a way that is more elegant and more powerful than what other companies are doing.

I would love to see voice-powered commands and search come to iOS 5. It is the single biggest thing I miss about carrying a Droid as my mobile phone. I’m really hoping Apple has something ready to go in the fall, even if it doesn’t come to the iPhone 4.

iCal Makes the Eyes Bleed

I was fortunate to once again join Myke and Terry on the always-great Bro Show podcast. This week, we talked about Lion, iPhone 5 rumors and the 13” MacBook Pro.

Be sure to stick around to the end. We included some bonus material this week.

Not So Portable

Ben Brooks, commenting on the 13” MacBook Pro:

Because nothing screams pro like: Supported resolutions: 1280 by 800 (native). If you really need power and portability with FireWire 800: MacBook Air 13″ Core i7 with a new Thunderbolt display. There are also Thunderbolt adapter cables in the works to provide FireWire 800 without the extra glass. The 13″ is dead and, unfortunately, Apple just hasn’t told it that yet.

Yes, the native resolution of the 13” MacBook Pro sucks, but I think I would have a hard time squeezing a 27” Thunderbolt Display into my server rack next time I need to go change something on my router or work directly on my Xserve. While new adaptors may be on the way, the Air isn’t a viable solution for someone like me today.

The 13" MacBook Pro’s Place in an Airy World

There’s been a lot of smack talk going on about the 13” MacBook Pro recently, and Thomas Brand has gotten sick of it:

The 13 inch MacBook Pro is more than a pound lighter than the 15 inch model. Its smaller dimensions mean it is usable on an economy class airplane tray table. If I am going to have to carry a computer to and from work, all over the hospital, and around the world on business trips I am going to want to have the lightest computer possible to do my job.

I agree with Brand. When I reviewed the machine back in 2009, I was impressed how good of a fit it was for my needs as an IT professional.

The same is true today. In fact, I am picking up the high-end 13” MacBook Pro tomorrow, as a replacement for my Core2Duo 15” MacBook Pro I currently have at work. I’m excited for something faster and smaller to be back in my bag.

This machine is a great cross between power and portability. Pros need FireWire 800, Ethernet and more onboard. I know I can’t live with an Air as my primary machine at work.

While I do think the 13” MacBook Pro’s days are numbered, I suspect that many will be sad when it goes. I know I will be.